« back to home page
Antonin Scalia got a taste of his own medicine while addressing NYU students at a function held by the members of the NYU Annual Survey of American Law. A bunch of students showed up to protest, particularly because of Scalia's dissenting opinion in Lawrence v. Texas. When the floor was opened to students to ask Scalia questions, one student, Eric Berndt, shocked the crowd by asking, "Do you sodomize your wife?" Scalia refused to answer the question, saying that the question was unworthy of an answer.
That's true, Mr. Justice Scalia, it is unworthy of an answer. It's a rude, tasteless, and invasive question that no civilized person should have to answer. It is doubly so when the state asks it of a private citizen.
Among the other aspects of our constitutional freedoms that conservatives find troubling is the concept of the right to privacy. The right to privacy isn't explicitly spelled out in the Constitution, but came about as a result of court cases such as Roe v. Wade which established that state laws against abortion violated a citizen's constitutional right to privacy. Conservatives, in their charge to "bring God back into government" (when He was never there in the first place), want to strip that away.
This is no better illustrated than by this recent statement by Tom DeLay:
"I blame Congress over the last 50 to 100 years for not standing up and taking its responsibility given to it by the Constitution. The reason the judiciary has been able to impose a separation of church and state that's nowhere in the Constitution is that Congress didn't stop them. The reason we had judicial review is because Congress didn't stop them. The reason we had a right to privacy is because Congress didn't stop them." (link)
If that doesn't trouble you, think about how you would answer the question that Antonin Scalia didn't feel worthy of an answer, if it came from your local magistrate. If we don't stop them, your right to privacy is history.